Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 26, 1989PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORNBY, Justice.

In this case we decide that a legal malpractice claim may be assigned; that before the 1987 amendments to Maine’s partnership law, a Maine partnership was not a suable entity (except in certain real estate related matters); that an insured’s insolvency and inability to pay an excess judgment do not foreclose a damage claim against its insurance carrier and lawyer for failure to defend or settle within policy-limits; and that certain other related issues involve genuine issues of material fact. We therefore remand for entry of an order dismissing the partnership defendant, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Jourdain v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Crabb v. National Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. One National Bank v. Joseph M. AntonellisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Ammon v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API