Thurston v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
HORNBY, Justice.
In this case we decide that a legal malpractice claim may be assigned; that before the 1987 amendments to Maine’s partnership law, a Maine partnership was not a suable entity (except in certain real estate related matters); that an insured’s insolvency and inability to pay an excess judgment do not foreclose a damage claim against its insurance carrier and lawyer for failure to defend or settle within policy-limits; and that certain other related issues involve genuine issues of material fact. We therefore remand for entry of an order dismissing the partnership defendant, but…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Jourdain v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Crabb v. National Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- One National Bank v. Joseph M. AntonellisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Ammon v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.