Legal Opinion

Kommavongsa v. Haskell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2003No. 71713-3PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kennedy, J*

This case, which was certified for direct review by Division Three of the Court of Appeals, raises a narrow question of first impression in Washington: Whether a legal malpractice claim is assignable to an adversary in the same litigation that gave rise to the alleged legal malpractice. We answer that narrow question in the negative on grounds of public policy, leaving for another day the broader issue of whether legal malpractice claims may be assignable in other circumstances. In so ruling, we affirm the judgment of the Spokane County Superior Court in these consolidated…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kommavongsa v. HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API