Crane v. Ferrier Brock Development Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint and thereupon gave judgment for the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.
The complaint contains many unnecessary allegations and these seem to have produced some confusion in the arguments. The following is a statement of the material facts alleged. On May 23, 1910, the defendant, a corporation, represented to plaintiff that it was seised in fee of a certain lot in a subdivision of land in Alameda County, known as "Cragmont, ’ ’ and thereupon offered to sell the same to plaintiff for the price of one thousand five…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Muller v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Morris v. CourtneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hagge v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Flint v. ConnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Blake v. ArpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bowman v. VictorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.