Morris v. Courtney
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. George E. Otis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BELCHER, C.
The facts stated in the complaint in this ease are in substance as follows: In February, 1893, plaintiff, desired to purchase an orange grove in or near Redlands, county of San Bernardino, and defendant represented to plaintiff that he, defendant, was the owner and in possession of a certain described tract of land-in that county, which he told plaintiff “consisted of ten acres free of streets/’ and a-Iso “consisted of ten acres of oranges, except that portion taken and occupied by the house situated on said premises/ Plaintiff relied upon said representations, and by reason…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Haight v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Cabot v. ChristieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- West v. Great Western Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.