Legal Opinion

Flint v. Conner

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 3539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover possession of a lot of land, with the dwelling-house thereon, and certain personal property, consisting of household furniture. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral agreement whereby the former agreed to sell and the latter agreed to buy the property, real and personal, for the sum of $17,250. Pursuant to such oral agreement, plaintiff and wife signed two instruments, one purporting to be a deed to the lot and the other a bill of sale of the personal property. Neither instrument named any grantee or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Burnett v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Browning v. EstesTexas Supreme Court · 1848

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Slocum v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Baugh v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Barcroft v. LivacichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Barnes v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API