Legal Opinion
United States v. Rowe
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 18, 2001No. 00-1640PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DiCLERICO, District Judge.
The appellant, Robert Rowe, brings a third appeal from his conviction and sentence for bankruptcy fraud. See United States v. Rowe, 144 F.3d 15 (1st Cir.1998) (“Rowe I”); United States v. Rowe, 202 F.3d 37 (1st Cir.2000) (“Rowe II ”). In the present appeal, Rowe contends that the district court erred in imposing a $10,000 fine and in ruling that the mandate in Rowe II precluded consideration of Rowe’s motion to dismiss Count II of the indictment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decisions of the district court.
Background 1
Rowe filed a personal bankruptcy…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Parrilla RománCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Mateo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Pablo Manjarrez A/K/A Pablo A/K/A Paul RiendCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.