Legal Opinion
Mateo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 7, 2002No. 02-1645PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Chief Judge.
Mateo pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to various federal drug related offenses. The district court found that Mateo’s offenses occurred at a time when he was the subject of an outstanding state warrant for probation violation. Under the Sentencing Guidelines, this equates to the commission of a federal crime while under sentence for another crime and raised Mateo’s criminal history score and (in all likelihood) his ultimate federal sentence. See U.S.S.G. §§ 4Al.l(d), 4A1.2(m). After being sentenced, Mateo filed a notice of appeal and, while the appeal…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gary Gerber v. David VaranoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Mateo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- In re SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Kenneth Bernard Rouse v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.