Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo Pupo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 28, 1989No. 87-1948, 87-1949PublishedCited by 196 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIONS EN BANC
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Juan Pimienta-Redondo and Alfredo Pupo, defendants-appellants, were resen-tenced by the district court after we reversed their convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute on one of two counts, affirmed on the second count, and remanded. United States v. *11Molinares Charris, 822 F.2d 1213 (1st Cir.1987). They argue that the revised sentences violated their due process rights and placed them in double jeopardy. We believe that the sentences were lawfully imposed and reject the appeals.
I. BACKGROUND
Pimienta-Redondo and Pupo, along with six…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by196 opinions
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Billy Ray McDowell Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William W. LillyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.