Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. the Holland, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1999No. CC 96-07-05514; CA A98544; SC S45440PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this negligence action for personal injuries that plaintiff sustained at defendant’s playground, the issue is whether plaintiff, who prevailed on her claim, is entitled to an award of attorney fees. The trial court vacated the arbitrator’s award of fees, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Rodriguez v. The Holland, Inc., 153 Or App 701, 957 P2d 203 (1998). We conclude that plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees and reverse.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff, a young child, broke her arm when she fell from a piece of play equipment at a playground owned and operated by defendant. Defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Johnson v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Crimson Trace Corp. v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Johnson v. SwaimOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Forsi v. HildahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Hale v. KlempCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API