Legal Opinion

Fresk v. Kraemer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2004No. CC 0001-00693; CA A115184; SC S50443PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C.J.

In this negligence action, the sole issue before us is plaintiffs entitlement to attorney fees under ORS 20.080(1). That statute provides, in part, that “no attorney fees shall be allowed to the plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant tendered to the plaintiff, prior to the commencement of the action * * * an amount not less than the damages awarded to the plaintiff.” ORS 20.080(1) (emphasis added). The question presented in this case is whether defendant “tendered” a money payment that precluded an award of attorney fees to plaintiff under ORS 20.080(1) when defendant made a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lowe v. HarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Powers v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. SAIF v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Johnson v. SwaimOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Johnson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API