Legal Opinion

State v. Carr

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1994No. CC 92-1046; CA A74940; SC S40882PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*410GILLETTE, J.

This is a criminal case in which defendant was convicted, after a trial to the court, of perjury. ORS 162.065 (set out infra). He appealed his conviction asserting, inter alia, that there was insufficient evidence that his admittedly false statement was a “sworn” statement to permit him to be convicted of that charge. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. State v. Carr, 125 Or App 270, 863 P2d 1316 (1993). Defendant sought review in this court, again asserting that the evidence against him was insufficient to support a conviction.1 We allowed review and now affirm the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Rodriguez v. the Holland, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API