Legal Opinion
Halos v. Nachbar
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1936No. 30,593PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Devaney, Chief Justice.
Action in replevin.
On November 14, 1933, plaintiff borrowed of defendant Nachbar the sum of $165, for which he executed and delivered to Nachbar his promissory note in the amount of $200, which was made payable to the Torrance Motor Company of Crookston, Minnesota. To secure payment of this note, a conditional sales contract covering the automobile was entered into between the Torrance Motor Company and plaintiff. On the same day the motor company assigned the $200 note and the sales contract to Nachbar. Upon receipt of these, Nachbar delivered his check for $165 to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Moody v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Iltis v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Kling v. Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Vos v. Albany Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944