Legal Opinion

Moody v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1923No. 23,415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the automobile of Neis Engstrom, in which she was riding, was struck by one of defendant’s trains at a street crossing in War-road, Minnesota. The same accident was involved in Engstrom against this defendant, reported in 153 Minn. 46, 189 N. W. 580 and 190 N. W. 68, and in the instant case the accident was described by the same witnesses.

Plaintiff based her right of recovery on the alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Reader v. OttisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Gowan v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Klotz v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. Denver & R. G. W. R. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Lundh v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Halos v. NachbarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Brulla v. CassadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Kloss v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API