Kling v. Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Hennepin county to recover $10,-lYO for personal injury sustained through collision with defendant’s motor truck. The facts are stated in tbe opinion. The case was tried before Hale, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,166. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The errors assigned are: That the evidence does not sustain the verdict; that the charge to the jury was prejudicial; that two instructions requested by defendant were not given; that an objection to the admission of testimony was overruled; and that a request to submit a special question for the jury to answer was denied.
Plaintiff was the conductor of an interurban street car running between St. Paul and Minneapolis. While his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Messenger v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Fairchild v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gammons v. GulbransonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Voge v. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Peterson v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Benson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Daly v. CurrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Halos v. NachbarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936