Seebold v. Eustermann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
On May 17, 1941, plaintiff entered into a conditional sales contract with defendant copartners for the purchase of a Ford truck with certain accessories. Possession of the vehicle was duly given to him. (The corporate defendant was eliminated from the case by the trial court, and, since no complaint is being made here, we shall hereinafter refer to the copartners as the only defendants.)
In August this suit was brought; its purpose, to have the sales contract “cancelled and vacated,” because under its terms defendants “exacted as interest” on the unpaid portion of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- Smith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Lukens v. HazlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Milo Theater Corp. v. National Theater SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.