Bruton v. Bland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
When a person discovers that he has been fraudulently induced to purchase property 'he must ©hooise between .two inconsistent remedies. He may repudiate the contract of sale, tender a return of the property, and recover the value of the .consideration with which he parted; or, he may affirm the contract, retain the property, and recover the difference between its real 'and -its represented value. He may not do. both. 'Once made, the election is final. The election must be made “promptly and within a reasonable time after the discovery of the fraud, or after he .should have -discovered, it by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Hutchins v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Fremont City Board of Education v. Wayne County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Bernard v. Cent. Carolina Truck SalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Simaan, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Allison v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.