Legal Opinion

Bruton v. Bland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1963No. 383PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

When a person discovers that he has been fraudulently induced to purchase property 'he must ©hooise between .two inconsistent remedies. He may repudiate the contract of sale, tender a return of the property, and recover the value of the .consideration with which he parted; or, he may affirm the contract, retain the property, and recover the difference between its real 'and -its represented value. He may not do. both. 'Once made, the election is final. The election must be made “promptly and within a reasonable time after the discovery of the fraud, or after he .should have -discovered, it by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Hutchins v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Fremont City Board of Education v. Wayne County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Bernard v. Cent. Carolina Truck SalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Simaan, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  5. Allison v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API