Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 7515SC555PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The order appealed from concluded that (1) the letter from Stewart Wallace, registered service agent, to the Clerk on 12 February 1975, constituted a general appearance under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 55, and defendant was entitled to notice of hearing of at least three days; (2) that the default judgment was void in that it was not entered with the consent of defendant and was not entered in open court under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 58; and (3) that there was nothing to support the award of treble damages pursuant to G.S. 75-16.

Plaintiff in his assignments of error takes the position that, first,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Dalminter, Inc. v. Jessie Edwards, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
  5. Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Winant v. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Mabrey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API