Legal Opinion

Cass v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 28, 1974No. 73-604PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Congress has provided in 10 U. S. C. § 687 (a) 1 that an otherwise eligible member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces, who is involuntarily released from active duty, “and who has completed, immediately before his release, at least five years of continuous active duty, is entitled to a readjustment payment computed by multiplying his years of active service ... by two months’ basic pay of the grade in which he is serving at the time of his release.” It is further provided that “[f]or the purposes of this subsection— ... (2) a part of a year that is six months'or more is counted as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. CulbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API