Legal Opinion

Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1982No. CA 18688, SC 28515PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

This is an action upon an insurance policy. Plaintiff-insured seeks to recover insurance for fire losses from two insurers, Royal Globe Insurance Company and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. Defendants asserted that the action is barred by the one-year limitation period of ORS 743.660. Plaintiff asserted that the period of limitation was tolled by ORS 12.155. It also asserted an estoppel against the insurers’ reliance on the limitation period. The trial court concluded that the limitation applied, found that the estoppel had not been established, and gave judgment for defendants.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hatley v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Duncan v. DubinOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hatley v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bell v. Quaker City Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Holman Transfer Co. v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Hamilton v. PaynterOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Nibler v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Johnson v. KentnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API