Legal Opinion

Nibler v. Oregon Department of Transportation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2005No. CC 0212-12262; SC S50351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

The issue in this original mandamus proceeding is whether defendants-relators, the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of State Police (defendants), are entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to change venue in the underlying negligence action from Multnomah County to Washington County. We conclude that defendants are entitled to that relief and, accordingly, direct the issuance of a peremptory writ.

The relevant facts are few and undisputed. Plaintiff-adverse party (plaintiff) and his wife were involved in an automobile accident in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mutzig v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Christensen v. CoberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. C.I.C.S. Emp't Servs., Inc. v. Newport Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Scott v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API