Helm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Before this Court is the appeal of William Helm (Claimant) from the July 31, 1990 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee denying Claimant workmen’s compensation benefits under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act 1 (Act).
Claimant was employed as a maintenance mechanic for U.S. Gypsum Company (Employer) until his discharge by Employer on or about July 4, 1985. On June 27, 1985, Claimant was involved in a physical confrontation with another employee in the locker room of Employer. As a result of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Gallo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- LeDonne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Link v. Hutzler Bros.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Camiolo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Kandra v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.