Legal Opinion

Camiolo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Peter Camiolo (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s petition for benefits. We affirm.

The facts in this case as determined by the WCJ are as follows. On December 9, 1992, Claimant received his paycheck from American Bank Notes (Employer). He clocked out from work during his lunch break and proceeded to drive his personal vehicle to the Super Fresh Store (Store), which is located approximately three miles from Employer’s premises, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Repco Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Manolovich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Berro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Penn State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Sekulski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Classic Landscaping, Inc. v. WCAB (Ramos)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. PA LCB v. A. Berardi (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Penn State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API