Imperial Brass Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*22MEMORANDUM BY TEE COURT
The findings show that the plaintiff manufactured certain articles which were ordinarily used in connection with automobile engines, automobile trucks, or automobiles. Most of these articles were specially designed and advertised for that purpose, but others, in some form, could be used in connection with stationary engines or for other purposes which did not render their sale taxable, and the evidence shows that the plaintiff sold some of these articles to manufacturers who did not make automobiles and dealers who did not supply parts for them. There is nothing,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
- Walker Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
- Edison Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Borg & Beck Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Advance Automobile Accessories Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928