Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1982No. 1235PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in denying his suppression motion. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the court below, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

After being stopped by police while riding a bicycle appellant was charged with receiving stolen property. The lower court denied his suppression motion challenging the propriety of the stop. At trial, a Commonwealth witness identified the bicycle and testified that it had been stolen.1 Appellant was adjudicated delinquent and sentenced to probation. This appeal followed.

In a suppression…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. ArchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. EspadaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. In the Interest of S.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. In the Interest of JermaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API