Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S.D.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1993No. 9PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

On October 31, 1992, at 5:25 a.m., Police Officer Jose Acevedo spoke to a pedestrian who claimed there were two armed black men with drugs around the corner. Approximately fifty feet from where he received this information, Officer Acevedo observed appellant S.D. standing with another man. No one else was in the vicinity. Since Acevedo had been told they were armed, he immediately performed a “pat-down” search during which he felt a large hard object in S.D.’s pocket. He then removed a clear plastic bag containing 50 plastic vials of crack cocaine. N.T. 12/8/92 at 5-10, 21.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. E.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HaywardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. KorenkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. MesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API