Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Arch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1995PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County following appellant’s conviction for unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. 1 Appellant now contends that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress. 2 After careful review, we reverse, vacate the judgment of séntence and remand for a new trial.

Examination of the record reveals the following: On July 24, 1991, Officer Scott Neal, while on routine patrol, heard a report that a white Toyota with a Virginia registration was being used by three black…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. MaxonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API