Commonwealth v. Kichline
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
On December 7, 1973, appellant James Preston Kichline was convicted after a jury trial of murder in the *271first degree. The trial court denied post-verdict motions and imposed judgment of sentence of life imprisonment. On this direct appeal,1 appellant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of numerous pretrial and trial errors. Finding none of his arguments persuasive, we affirm the judgment of sentence.
I. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE
This Court is required to review the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction in every case of murder…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by307 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Fahy v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.