Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1969No. Appeal, 317PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Mb.

Justice Eagen,

Walter Hicks, after a trial without a jury, was convicted of the crimes of burglary, attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools. Post-trial motions were dismissed and prison sentences were imposed on the first two charges. On appeal the Superior Court affirmed the judgments with Judge Hoffman dissenting, 209 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 223 A. 2d 873 (1966). We granted allocatur.

Hicks was stopped on a street in Philadelphia by two policemen without a warrant. A “patting down” of his person revealed that he had a penknife with a three inch blade in one of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API