People v. Palermo Land and Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By an information filed by the district attorney in the superior court of Butte county, appellant was accused of the crime of "failing and refusing to sell and deliver water for the purpose of irrigating the orchard of William Hilemon." A motion was made to set aside the information on the ground "that before the filing thereof the defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate." The motion was denied.
A demurrer to the information was also interposed, setting forth: "1. That the court has no jurisdiction of the offense charged therein; 2. That it does not substantially conform to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. HambergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. HaagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- People v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Granite Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.