Ex parte Ah Men
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Petitioner claims that he should be discharged from custody, for the following reasons: 1. Because the affidavit on which the warrant was issued was insufficient to give the court jurisdiction to order the arrest of petitioner; 2. Because the petitioner was arrested under a general warrant of arrest in Nevada County by the deputy sheriff of Yuba County; 3. Because he was arrested in the night-time, and without an in*200dorsement on the warrant of arrest to authorize the arrest at that time; 4. Because the warrant of arrest did not show upon its face facts authorizing the arrest; and 5. Because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mahon v. JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1835
- Ex parte KelloggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bert Strand, Sheriff of San Diego County, State of California v. William SchmittrothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKEOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Rigor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.