Legal Opinion

In Re McKinney

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1968No. Crim. 12698PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Gene Allen McKinney petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. The Superior Court of Alameda County found that by refusing to answer questions as a witness at a trial, McKinney was guilty of criminal contempt of court in violation of subdivision 6 of section 166 of the Penal Code which defines the crime as a misdemeanor. Petitioner was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for six months less time previously served for violation of this section.

The problem arises under the following circumstances: Petitioner was called as a defense witness on August 21, 1968, in the trial of Huey Newton…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In re ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. StandishCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API