Legal Opinion
Warner-Lambert Company v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 1, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-56; Court 02-00254PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, Warner-Lambert Company (“WLC”), challenges the classification of its merchandise by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”) under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), subheading 1704.90.35, 19 U.S.C. § 1202 (2000), as a sugar confec-tionary with a duty rate of 5.6 percent ad valorem. - WLC claims that the imported merchandise is a sugar-free product that should be classified under HTSUS subheading 3306.90.00, which provides for preparations for oral or dental hygiene that are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Drygel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Drygel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.