Legal Opinion
Drygel, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 9, 2008No. 2008-1101PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the tariff classification of Gel-A-Mint MagikStrips®, a breath-freshening product imported into the United States by Drygel, Inc. (“Drygel”). Drygel appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade granting the United States’ (“the government’s”) cross-motion for summary judgment that the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) correctly classified the MagikStrips at a 6.4% duty rate under subheading 2106.90.99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), a catchall provision that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Russell Stadelman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Degussa Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Arko Foods International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- R.T. Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Storewall, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.