Legal Opinion
Warner-Lambert Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 11, 2005No. 2004-1489PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit-Judge.
The United States Court of International Trade sustained the United States Customs Service determination to classify Warner-Lambert’s imported Certs® “Powerful Mints” under Harmonized Tariff, Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 2106.90.99, as a “food preparation not elsewhere specified or included.” Customs had proposed this classification if the Court of International Trade found, as a matter of fact, that the mints are sugar-free. Warner-Lambert instead sought classification under HTSUS subheading 3306.90.00, “Preparations for oral or dental hygiene ...…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- The Mead Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Wilton Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.