Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 1936No. 13,988PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the insurance company and Vaughn, and defendants in error as the commission and Lipe, respectively.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Vaughn was the employer, the insurance company carried his industrial insurance, and Lipe was his employee. Lipe was injured November 24,1933, while engaged about the drilling of an oil well at Craig, Colorado. Such proceedings were regularly had as resulted in an award to him, by the commission, of $14 per week for one year from December 5, 1933, for temporary disability, and 139 weeks thereafter, at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. Wandersee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hall v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. A. M. Platt, Inc. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brooke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Denver Truck Exchange & State Compensation Insurance Fund v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Buckingham Transp. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Geisler v. People Ex Rel. GeislerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Boyle v. G. & K. TRUCKING CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API