Legal Opinion

Wandersee v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The defendant Sam Moskewitz is a resident of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, and an employer under the workmen’s compensation act. Bernard F. Wandersee is, and at all of the times hereinafter mentioned was, a resident of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Some time in November, 1926, he entered into a contract with Moskewitz, at Chippewa Falls, to buy hides and furs for Moskewitz in Minne*347sota and part of South Dakota. He covered his territory with an automobile furnished by Moskewitz. On January 21, 1927, while driving between Janesville and Richmond, Minnesota, one of his feet was frozen. He made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Val Blatz Brewing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  4. Interstate Power Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API