A. M. Platt, Inc. v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The first named plaintiff in error is hereafter referred to as “Platt,” and the other as “the Casualty Company;” the first named defendant in error as “Mrs. Reynolds,” the other as “the Commission,” and Mrs. Reynold’s deceased husband as “Reynolds.”
Platt was engaged in the automobile business in Denver, Colorado, and carried its liabilities, under the act in question, with the Casualty Company. In July, 1928, Platt, by contract entered into in Colorado, employed Reynolds to promote its wholesale automobile business in and about Chadron, Nebraska.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Wandersee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. HowingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Home Insurance v. HeppSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Tripp v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931