Legal Opinion
Durham v. Blackard
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 8, 1993No. 2086PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
The appellant, Raisa F. Durham (Durham), brought this action to enjoin the respondent/creditor, Robert blackard (Blackard), from selling a 5-acre tract of land under an execution of judgment against Durham’s predecessor in title, Karl W. McMillan (McMillan). Blackard impleaded McMillan, and alleged the deed from McMillan to Durham was a voidable transfer under the Statute of Elizabeth. South Carolina Federal intervened and brought cross-claims based on a judgment it had obtained against McMillan. McMillan never responded and was declared in default.
Blackard then moved for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Coleman v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Jeffords v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- First State Savings and Loan Assoc. v. NodineCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Dufresne v. Regency Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Hovis v. Ducate (In Re Ducate)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- In Re Amtron, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
- Campbell v. Haddock (In Re Haddock)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Donnan Ex Rel. Owens v. MarinerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.