Legal Opinion

Dufresne v. Regency Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 22, 1987No. 0981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in equity to set aside a transfer of corporate assets brought pursuant to Section 27-23-10, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, commonly known as the Statute of Elizabeth. Mary Lou Dufresne seeks to have set aside a conveyance of assets by Regency Realty, Inc., to Mary Jane Zabinski. The circuit court set aside the transfer. Mrs. Zabinski appeals. We affirm.

Regency was a corporation engaged in the business of real estate brokerage. Prior to August, 1982, all of the stock in Regency was owned by Dufresne and C. J. Odom. Each owned 50%.

On August 31, 1982, Dufresne, Odom and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurd v. New York & Commercial Steam Laundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Matthews v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. First State Savings and Loan Assoc. v. NodineCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Holman v. HudsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
  3. Royal Z Lanes, Inc. v. Collins Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Durham v. BlackardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. First Union National Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API