Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Kirven
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 18, 1937No. 14486PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabler.
I regret that I am unable to agree with Mr. Justice Baker that the judgment in this case should be reversed in part. A careful study of the record convinces me that Judge Oxner correctly decided all questions involved. His order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed in toto.
Messrs. Justices Carter and Bonham concur. Messrs. Justices BakEr and Fisi-iburne dissent.
2Cited by23 opinions
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Coleman v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Marquette Corporation v. PriesterDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
- Ncnb National Bank of North Carolina v. Ralph L. Tiller Julia K. Tiller Ellen Tiller Bass Julia Tiller Boyd Emily Louise Kellahan Dr. Wendell H. Tiller Walter Armstrong Kennedy, III Estate of Wendell H. Tiller (Deceased) by Ralph L. Tiller and Dr. Wendell H. Tiller, Co-Executors, Williamson Brothers Fertilizer and Grain, Inc. v. Ncnb National Bank of North Carolina, Ncnb National Bank of North Carolina v. Ralph L. Tiller Julia K. Tiller Ellen Tiller Bass Julia Tiller Boyd Emily Louise Kellahan Dr. Wendell H. Tiller Walter Armstrong Kennedy, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.