Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Daniel
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 5, 1973No. 19689PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
The plaintiff, Moseley C. Coleman, is the owner of two deficiency judgments procured May 30, 1966, against the defendant Linzie L. Rogers, and against his son, L. M. Rogers, known as Buddy Rogers. Coleman brings this action as a creditor of defendant Linzie Rogers, under South Carolina Code, § 57-301 (1962).
The complaint alleges that a deed dated October 26, 1964, to 198 acres of land, executed by Linzie Rogers to his daughter, Annie Margaret Rogers Daniel, and to her husband, James D. Daniel, II, both of whom are also defendants, was a fraudulent conveyance for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Jeffords v. BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Farmers Bank v. BradhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Dinkins v. RobbinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- McInnis v. McRaeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Hovis v. Ducate (In Re Ducate)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Royal Z Lanes, Inc. v. Collins Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Durham v. BlackardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.