Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 23, 2009No. Civil Action 05-2502 (RWR)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sandra Marshall brought numerous employment-related claims against defendants Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Honeywell”), L-3 Communications Government Services, Inc. (“GSI”), and SGT, Inc. (“SGT”). A memorandum opinion and order dated February 26, 2008, dismissed as untimely Marshall’s claim against GSI for Equal Pay Act violations, and dismissed as unexhausted claims against GSI and SGT for age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and Maryland law. Marshall seeks…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pueschel v. National Air Traffic Controllers' Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Tucker v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Norris v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Minter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Modis, Inc. v. Infotran Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.