Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 26, 2008No. Civil Action 05-2502 (RWR)PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sandra Marshall’s corrected amended complaint variously alleges against defendants Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Honeywell”), L-3 Communications Government Services, Inc. (“GSI”) and SGT, Inc. (“SGT”), age, sex, and race discrimination and retaliation, violations of her Fifth and Eighth Amendment protections and her rights under the Equal Pay Act, and common law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent supervision. SGT moved to dismiss all claims against it and GSI moved to dismiss…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Hinton v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hall v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.