Legal Opinion
Norris v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 19, 2018No. Civil Action No.: 16-cv-02120 (RC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Terri Norris, an employee of Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ("WMATA"), brought this action alleging quid pro quo sexual harassment, hostile work environment, gender discrimination, age discrimination, and retaliation in October 2016. After Norris's age discrimination claim was dismissed in February 2017, WMATA now moves for summary judgment on the four remaining claims. Having reviewed the parties' filings, the Court grants in part and denies in part WMATA's motion for summary judgment.
II. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Klotzbach-Piper v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Copeland v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Dougherty v. Cable News NetworkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Ibrahim v. BlinkenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Kennedy v. Dynamic-Pro, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.