Legal Opinion
Berkshire International Corp. v. Alba-Waldensian, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1972No. 72 Civ. 2234PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
On May 8, 1972, Pilot Research Corporation, the owner of three patents for seamless knit garments and methods, sent a telegram to Berkshire International Corporation stating that a panty hose garment manufactured by Berkshire was covered by one or more of the three patents and suggesting a conference to discuss the matter. Berkshire’s response was the commencement of this action on May 23 for a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity and non-infringement. The defendants are Pilot and Alba-Waldensian, Inc., which owns all the stock of Pilot. Two days…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Volk Corp. v. Art-Pak Clip Art ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Scheinbart v. Certain-Teed Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Cento Group, S.P.A. v. OroAmerica, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Gdovin v. Catawba Rental Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.