Legal Opinion

Scheinbart v. Certain-Teed Products Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 5, 1973No. 73 Civ. 2803-LFMPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MacMAHON, District Judge.

This is a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this derivative action to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice.

The complaint, invoking both statutory 1 and pendent jurisdiction, alleges violations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act), 2 Rule 206(4) promulgated thereunder, 3 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Securities Act) 4 and the common law.

Plaintiff is one of 5,900 shareholders of defendant Builders Investment Group (Builders), a real estate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  4. Cain v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  5. Ayers v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API