Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The single issue presented for decision in this case is whether the United States District Court in New Orleans, acting under 28 U. S. C. § 1404 (a), erred in ordering that this action for damages to cargo from alleged unseaworthiness be transferred for trial, “in the interest of justice,” to the United States District Court at Memphis, Tennessee, where the sinking of the barge occurred. The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's transfer order. 268 F. 2d 240. We granted certiorari to consider this important question. 361 U. S. 811.
The facts and circumstances on which the District…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- The City of NorwichSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Point Landing, Inc., Intervenor v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- British Transport Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Continental Grain Company v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc., and Barge Fbl-585Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by726 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V MonadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
721 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.