Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jack G. Buncher, D/B/A the Buncher Company v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 20, 1969No. 16638Published

1DissentVan Dusen, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because this record shows that the determination of back pay, based on the seniority system adopted by the General Counsel, is arbitrary and unreasonable under the circumstances and that the substantial award is punitive, rather than remedial, in nature.1

The trial examiners in both the original unfair labor practice case and the present back pay case made detailed findings of the peculiar nature of Bunch-er’s business and his employment practices. Buncher operated out of three locations: Nine Mile Run, Leetsdale, and the Yard.” The business was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API