Eastman v. Means
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action to recover damages for injuries which, according to the findings of the trial court, were wilfully inflicted by appellant upon respondent, the latter being a minor. Judgment was entered against appellant and the appeal taken therefrom.
As a ground for reversal it is contended that the court erred in permitting the father and mother of the minor to testify that following the injuries alleged certain conversations were had by them by means of the telephone, which, if the person with whom they conversed was the appellant, were admissible as evidence of admissions then made by the latter.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LorraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. HoraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. CannedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. RoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.