Legal Opinion

People v. Roy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1967No. Crim. 11559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

On February 5, 1965, Stella Weeks signed up for telephone answering service with RSYP Answering Service operated by Theresa Roy. In a personal talk with Mrs. Roy, Mrs. Weeks implied she was a prostitute and expressed a desire that her business calls be kept confidential, especially from the police. After some discussion about hours for calls and the handling of difficult callers, referred to as tricks, Mrs. Weeks paid a $15 deposit. As she was leaving Mrs. Roy gave her the following advice: “. . . don’t get greedy, there’s plenty to go around, and check the references of your guys. Don’t take…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. LauriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Maynard v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. RoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API